Chaudhary

878 F.2d 385 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ram Chandra CHAUDHARY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent No. 88-7311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1989. Decided June 20, 1989. Before FLETCHER, NELSON and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ram Chandra Chaudhary ("Chaudhary") challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeal ("BIA") affirming the immigration judge's (IJ's) denial of his application for withholding of deportation under Section 243(h) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (the Act) and for asylum under Section 208(a) of the Act. He argues that the BIA's decision to deny him withholding of deportation and asylum was not supported by substantial evidence; that the BIA applied the wrong legal standard in assessing his asylum claim; and that he was effectively deprived of his right to counsel. We deny the petition for…