Altman

United States v. Altman

Good Law
878 F.2d 387
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 198936-3_4California1,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

878 F.2d 387 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Junbeth ALTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-1291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 3, 1989. * Decided June 27, 1989. Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. Before POOLE, REINHARDT, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Junbeth Altman appeals her conviction on criminal tax charges. She and her husband were charged with willfully failing to file 1980 and 1981 individual federal income tax returns and with willfully filing fraudulent refund claims for the years 1976 through 1979. 3 During the district court trial, her co-defendant husband, Harold Altman, made a motion in limine to exclude evidence of his invocation of the fifth amendment right against self-incrimination during an interview with IRS agent Fulwider. Junbeth Altman joined in the motion. At that point, the court recessed to allow the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.