United States v. Wayne L. Wells

Good Law
878 F.2d 1232·1989 WL 75207·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9886
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 198988-3234California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wayne Louis Wells, a felon, was found in possession of a firearm and charged with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) (West Supp.1989). Wells pleaded guilty to the charge and a presentence report was prepared, as required by the Sentencing Reform Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3552 (West Supp. 1989). Applying the categories established by the Sentencing Commission, the presen-tence report gave Wells a criminal history rating of IV and his offense a “total offense level” of seven. Based on these two ratings, the Sentencing Guidelines recommend a sentencing range from eight to fourteen months. The district court, however, sentenced Wells to twenty-four months incarceration. In this appeal, Wells challenges the district court’s departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. We vacate the sentence and remand for further proceedings.

The district court explained its decision to depart from the Sentencing Guidelines’ recommended sentence as follows:

This brief statement is the only explanation in the record for the district court’s upward departure from the Guidelines. The district court did not specify the events in Wells’ criminal history that the court found inadequately represented by a category…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.