Shane

United States v. Shane

Good Law
878 F.2d 1439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 198936-3_9California1,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

878 F.2d 1439 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ringo SHANE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-3127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * April 25, 1989. Decided June 29, 1989. Before KILKENNY, WIGGINS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ringo Shane was convicted following a jury trial for conspiracy to distribute cocaine (count I) and possession with intent to distribute (count II). He was sentenced to eight years on each count, the sentences to run consecutively and not concurrently. He filed a timely appeal from his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction and AFFIRM. 3 Shane asserts three grounds to reverse his conviction: (1) that an inconsistency exists between the court's remarks from the bench at sentencing and the judgment ultimately entered; (2) that his sentence was markedly greater than the sentences imposed on the other participants who pled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.