Charles K. Kanekoa Warren E. Kanekoa v. City and County of Honolulu Douglas G. Gibb, and State of Hawaii, Defendant/intervenor-Appellee. Damien Melemai v. City and County of Honolulu Douglas G. Gibb

Good Law
879 F.2d 607·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9369
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 198987-2636California8,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

879 F.2d 607 58 USLW 2071 Charles K. KANEKOA; Warren E. Kanekoa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Douglas G. Gibb, Defendants-Appellees, and State of Hawaii, Defendant/Intervenor-Appellee. Damien MELEMAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Douglas G. Gibb, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 87-2636, 87-2844. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1988. Decided June 29, 1989. Eric A. Seitz, Lowenthal, August, Graham & Seitz, Honolulu, Haw., for plaintiffs-appellants. Michael Dorn, Deputy Corp. Counsel, City and County of Honolulu, Honolulu, Haw., for defendants-appellees. Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of Haw., for defendant/intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before WALLACE, TANG and NELSON, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 In this consolidated appeal, Charles Kanekoa, Warren Kanekoa (the Kanekoas), and Damien Melemai challenge the judgments in their actions under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against the city and county of Honolulu (Honolulu) for violating their fourth amendment rights to a prompt probable cause hearing. The Kanekoas and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.