Chalkboard, Inc. Karen M. Hoyt v. Susan Brandt Boyd Dover Lucinda Blair Andy Harclerode Sherry Meredith Lloyd Novick Douglas X. Patino Darwin Cox

Good Law
879 F.2d 668·1989 WL 75921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 198988-1523California3,109 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

The plaintiffs, Chalkboard, Inc., a day care center, and its owner-operator Karen Hoyt brought this civil rights action in District Court for money damages against officials of the Arizona Department of Health Services (“DHS”), and the Arizona Department of Economic Security (“DES”), agencies responsible for child day care programs. The claim is based on defendants’ actions in summarily suspending Chalkboard’s license to operate a day care center. The defendants moved for summary judgment on grounds of absolute and qualified immunity. The District Court denied the motion and the defendants appeal. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2817 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985), Kraus v. County of Pierce, 793 F.2d 1105, 1107-8 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 932 , 107 S.Ct. 1571 , 94 L.Ed.2d 763 (1987).

We review de novo the denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Kraus v. County of Pierce, 793 F.2d at 1106-07 .

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On October 10, 1985, the Tucson Police Department received a complaint from a local citizen that her young daughter had been sexually abused while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.