Albuquerque v. Arizona Indoor Soccer, Inc.

Good Law
880 F.2d 416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 198936-3_8California1,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

880 F.2d 416 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Oscar ALBUQUERQUE; Franz St. Lot; Gene Strenicer, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. ARIZONA INDOOR SOCCER, INC., dba Phoenix Pride, Defendant, and Merrill Communications, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 88-1778, 88-1868. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1989. Decided July 19, 1989. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and ALARCON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We consider whether the district court abused its discretion in granting a motion to amend a judgment based on newly discovered evidence, and conclude it did not. FACTS and PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 In July of 1985, Oscar Albuquerque, appellant and cross-appellee here, and other plaintiffs obtained a judgment against Arizona Indoor Soccer, Inc. ("AISI"). In pursuing collection of the 1985 judgment, Albuquerque caused a writ of garnishment to be issued and served on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.