Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy

Good Law
881 F.2d 602·1989 WL 96512·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3718
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 198987-6690California1,463 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ferguson, J.

Appellant McCarthy, Director of the Department of Corrections of the State of California, appeals the district court’s decision to grant appellee Blair’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

In May 1983, Roulette Blair, pursuant to a plea bargain, entered a plea of guilty in state court to possession of a controlled substance (codeine) for sale, in violation of the Cal.Health & Safety Code § 11351(a). The trial court suspended Blair’s sentence and placed him on probation for three years. Blair’s conviction was subject to Cal.Penal Code § 3000(a), which imposes mandatory parole for a period not to exceed three years.

In December, 1983, Blair was arrested for a probation violation and sentenced to three years in state prison. In March, 1986, Blair was released on parole. He was, however, arrested as a parole violator in August, 1986, and reincarcerated.

While in custody, after exhausting his state remedies, Blair filed a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming, among other things, that his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution had been violated as he was not informed of, and consequently was unaware…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.