Call v. Sumitomo Bank of California

881 F.2d 626 11 Employee Benefits Ca 1273 Sterling CALL, Ralph Robinson and Edison Willers, as individuals; Sterling Call and Ralph Robinson as Plan Administrators of the Phase II Corporation Restated Profit Sharing Plan; and Sterling Call, Kenneth Friedman and Edison Willers as Plan Administrators of the California Etching Corporation Restated Profit Sharing Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Ray W. Sherman, Jr., an individual, Khateeb A. Lateef, an individual, and Lateef Management Associates, a partnership, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-15076. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 27, 1989. Decided July 26, 1989. Edward D. Burmeister, Baker & McKenzie, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Steven E. Schon, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees Lateef. Jeffrey H. Lowenthal, Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Flinn, Matzger & Melnick, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Sumitomo Bank of California. Richard Mark, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Ray W. Sherman, Jr. Appeal from the United States…