Patrick Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corporation

Good Law
881 F.2d 788·14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 43·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11706
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 198987-5825California7,780 words

Opinion

Opinion

881 F.2d 788 58 USLW 2161 , 14 Fed.R.Serv.3d 43 Patrick TOWNSEND, Karen Townsend, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOLMAN CONSULTING CORPORATION, Defendant, and Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby; Trust Services of America, Inc.; American Insurance Administrators; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12, AFL-CIO, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 87-5825, 87-6154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1988. Decided Aug. 7, 1989. Fred L. Wright, Torrance, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert G. Wilson, Wilson & Reitman, Los Angeles, Cal., for the Towers defendants-appellees. Della Bahan, Reich, Adell & Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., for the IUOE # 12 defendants-appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: 1 With this case, we return to a subject which has occupied much of this court's time in the last several years: the appropriateness of monetary sanctions leveled by a district judge against an attorney under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. The rule states in relevant part: 2 The signature of an attorney or party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.