Dulles

881 F.2d 1083 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walt Foster DULLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLUOR ENGINEERS, INC.; Bilby & Schoenhair; Michael J. Rushing, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * June 13, 1989. Decided Aug. 9, 1989. Before SNEED, FLETCHER and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dulles appeals, pro se, the dismissal of his complaint by the district court. We dismiss his appeal, but remand to the district court to clarify whether its order is a final order of dismissal. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 On March 22, 1988 Dulles filed a complaint in district court alleging that the named defendants had conspired to destroy evidence and defraud the federal courts. Having found no basis for subject matter jurisdiction the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. We lack jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1982) to hear this appeal.…