Kenneth Farley v. Daniel E. Henderson, Arnold K. Riley Carolyn B. Riley Tamara Riley Robert J. Wright v. Daniel E. Henderson AKA Dan Harris James Lowell Jerry Borsch Tom Honte Randy Jones Mervin Lakin Sandra Ramsey Board of Medical Examiners

Good Law
883 F.2d 709
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 198987-1771California1,315 words

Opinion

Opinion

883 F.2d 709 Kenneth FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel E. HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellee. Arnold K. RILEY; Carolyn B. Riley; Tamara Riley; Robert J. Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel E. HENDERSON; aka Dan Harris; James Lowell; Jerry Borsch; Tom Honte; Randy Jones; Mervin Lakin; Sandra Ramsey; Board of Medical Examiners, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 87-1771, 87-2275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided May 17, 1989. As Amended Aug. 29, 1989. Kenneth Farley, pro se. Robert J. Wright, Noti, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants. Jane E. Beach, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before POOLE, FERGUSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants in these two consolidated actions are members of the Holy Spirit of God Church. Both actions raise the identical issue: Whether the arrest of "psychic surgeon" Gary Magno by Phoenix police officer Daniel Henderson deprived appellants of their first amendment free exercise rights. We conclude that it did not and affirm the dismissal of both actions. 2 Magno professes to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.