Victorino Villamarin Blancada v. James B. Turnage

Good Law
883 F.2d 836·1989 WL 99297·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 20862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 198988-6561California1,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Petitioner Blancada argues that the district court erred in denying his habeas petition based on the conclusion that the district director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) acted within his discretion in denying Blancada’s request for a stay of deportation pending the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) determination of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We reverse.

I

Blancada, a native of the Philippines, entered the United States in February 1986 as a nonimmigrant visitor. In June 1987, the INS district director issued an order to show cause why Blancada was not deporta-ble. In early January 1988, Blancada married Alma Baruc, a resident alien. On January 22,1988, Blancada appeared before an immigration judge (IJ) and admitted deport-ability.

In July 1988, Blancada’s wife became a naturalized United States citizen. On October 3, 1988, the district director denied Blancada’s request for a stay of deportation. On October 19, 1988, Blancada filed motions before the IJ to reopen deportation proceedings contending that he should be allowed to adjust his status based on his marriage to an American citizen and to stay of deportation. On October 21,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.