Dell

Dell v. Parmar CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 5, 2021E073851California5,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/5/21 Dell v. Parmar CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

STEWART DELL, Individually and as Successor, etc., et al.,

E073851

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1504642) v.

OPINION

VIKRAM S. PARMAR et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. David Cohn, Judge.

Affirmed.

WLA Legal Services and Steven Zelig for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

LaFollette Johnson DeHaas Fesler & Ames, Michael J. Doubet and Grigory

Rchtouni for Defendant and Respondent Mazin Munir.

Cole Pedroza, Kenneth R. Pedroza, Michael A. Carlin; Walker and Mann, Jeffrey

A. Walker and Jeffrey K. Keyes for Defendants and Respondents St. Mary High Desert

Medical Group and Vikram S. Parmar.

1 Plaintiffs and appellants Stewart Dell, Individually…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.