Dell
Dell v. Parmar CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/5/21 Dell v. Parmar CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
STEWART DELL, Individually and as Successor, etc., et al.,
E073851
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1504642) v.
OPINION
VIKRAM S. PARMAR et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. David Cohn, Judge.
Affirmed.
WLA Legal Services and Steven Zelig for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
LaFollette Johnson DeHaas Fesler & Ames, Michael J. Doubet and Grigory
Rchtouni for Defendant and Respondent Mazin Munir.
Cole Pedroza, Kenneth R. Pedroza, Michael A. Carlin; Walker and Mann, Jeffrey
A. Walker and Jeffrey K. Keyes for Defendants and Respondents St. Mary High Desert
Medical Group and Vikram S. Parmar.
1 Plaintiffs and appellants Stewart Dell, Individually…