People v. Perkins CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 5, 2021A162240MCalifornia2,275 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

Filed 10/5/21 P. v. Perkins CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A162240

v. JOHN PERKINS, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. SCN 165897, CT Defendant and Appellant. 1674512)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION;

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

BY THE COURT:

The opinion filed October 1, 2021 is modified as follows: In Section II, on page 6, the sentence that reads “To the contrary, the court acknowledged appellant’s age was ‘the most protective did court say protective or predictive? Factor’ in avoiding re-offense, but the court explained in detail why it did not consider that factor dispositive given appellant’s physical vigor, his lack of insight, his “psychopathic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.