In re Ari S.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2021B307714California1,916 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 10/6/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

In re ARI S., a Person Coming B307714, B311334 Under the Juvenile Court Law. ______________________________ (Los Angeles County LOS ANGELES COUNTY Super. Ct. No. 20CCJP03596A)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KRISSY S.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Sabina A. Helton and Stacy Wiese, Judges. Affirmed. Jesse McGowan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, and Sally Son, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________ Krissy S., the mother of Ari S., challenges the juvenile court’s assumption of jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“the Act”). She asserts Montana, not California, has jurisdiction. We affirm because California has significant connections jurisdiction under Family Code section 3421, subdivision (a)(2). Undesignated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.