People v. Escapita CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2021A161303MCalifornia7,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 10/7/21 P. v. Escapita CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161303

v. DAISY ESCAPITA, (Napa County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant. 18CR004040/20CR000150)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 29, 2021, be modified as follows:

On page 23, the first two full paragraphs are modified to read:

“When Escapita was sentenced, section 1203a provided that a trial court may grant misdemeanor probation ‘for a period not to exceed three years.’ (Former § 1203a.) The trial court here granted probation for three years.” “Effective January 1, 2021, Assembly Bill No. 1950 (AB 1950)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.