United States v. Victor Fourstar, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 202120-30267California475 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 7 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30267

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00052-DLC-1 v. 4:02-cr-00052-DLC

VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 5, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Defendant appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised

release. We review de novo whether a defendant received due process at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.