Dominic Bailey v. John Myrick

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 202120-35549California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOMINIC BAILEY, No. 20-35549

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01423-HZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOHN MYRICK,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 5, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Dominic Bailey appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition under

28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

We review a district court’s denial of a § 2254 petition de novo. Cain v.

Chappell, 870 F.3d 1003, 1012 (9th Cir. 2017). Bailey’s petition is governed by the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.