Dominic Bailey v. John Myrick
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 202120-35549California733 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 7 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOMINIC BAILEY, No. 20-35549
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01423-HZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JOHN MYRICK,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 5, 2021** Portland, Oregon
Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Dominic Bailey appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition under
28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
We review a district court’s denial of a § 2254 petition de novo. Cain v.
Chappell, 870 F.3d 1003, 1012 (9th Cir. 2017). Bailey’s petition is governed by the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty…