Carrasco

Carrasco v. State Personnel Bd.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 2021E072892California13,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Rejection of Carrasco During Probation.

After 20 years of service as a probation officer, in April 2008, Carrasco was hired

by the department as a parole agent. On July 31, 2013, he was promoted to special agent

within the Office of Correctional Safety (OCS) Special Services Unit. Carrasco was

subject to a 12-month probationary period for his new position, and he reported for duty

on August 1, 2013.

On June 23, 2014, the department served Carrasco with a “Notice of Rejection

During Probation Period.” The notice listed six reasons for Carrasco’s rejection: (1) he

failed to exit his vehicle to assist in a foot pursuit of an escapee in

3 September 2013; (2) he failed to follow instructions during a tactical training exercise

conducted in January 2014, and he was discourteous and refused to follow instructions

from his supervisor; (3) he failed to follow instructions from his supervisor in

October 2013 to work on a “cold case” and neglected to “develop any investigative work

on the case” from the time of the instructions to February 2014; (4) he failed to timely

submit a report within six business days of a March 2014 arrest,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.