In re V.C. CA6

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Neither the charging document nor the facts underlying V.C.’s crimes appear in the record on appeal. On June 12, 2017, V.C. admitted violations of commission of a lewd act on a child under the age of 14 by force (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1)1; count 1), commission of a lewd act on a child under the age of 14 (§ 288, subd. (a); count 3), and first degree burglary (§§ 459, 460, subd. (a); count 4). The juvenile court found V.C. came within Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. On July 18, 2017, the juvenile court declared V.C. a ward of the court and committed him to DJJ for a maximum period of two years, 11 months. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 731, subd. (c).) Among the conditions imposed by the juvenile court was that V.C. “obey the reasonable and proper directives of his parents.” V.C. began his DJJ commitment on October 3, 2017. On February 25, 2020, the juvenile court conducted a reentry disposition hearing to determine the conditions under which V.C. would be supervised by the probation department following his DJJ commitment. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 1766.) V.C. was then 22 years old. V.C.’s parents and brother attended the hearing.…