Cir
Raymond Chico v. Cir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 202120-71017California567 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OCT 8 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RAYMOND CHICO; RUBY CHICO, No. 20-71017
Petitioners-Appellants, Tax Ct. No. 22264-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Submitted October 6, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Raymond and Ruby Chico appeal the Tax Court’s imposition of a fraud
penalty for their 2010 through 2012 federal income tax returns. We have
jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the Tax Court’s imposition of a fraud penalty for clear error, see
Bradford v. Comm’r, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986), and we apply clear error
review to Tax Court decisions based on a stipulated record, even when…