Linda Castellucci v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 202120-55852California1,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 8 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA CASTELLUCCI, an individual, No. 20-55852

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04580-AB-KS v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 6, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Linda Castellucci appeals from an order dismissing her claims against

JPMorgan Chase Bank (“Chase”) relating to Chase’s failure to consider her

application for a loan modification. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291, and we affirm.

Castellucci has lived at 5740 Kanan Dume…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.