Cynthia Lorica v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 8 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA SURATOS LORICA, No. 20-71117

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-271-411

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 5, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Cynthia Lorica, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her second motion to

reopen. Lorica claims her husband as a derivative beneficiary. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Silva v. Garland, 993 F.3d 705, 717…