United States v. Kimball

Good Law
884 F.2d 1274
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 198989-10011California3,096 words

Opinion

Opinion

884 F.2d 1274 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Richardson KIMBALL, aka Robert Anthony Glynn, aka Robert Glyn Bland; Brian Peter Daniels; Bruce Emil Aitken; Edward Joel Seltzer; William Henry Harris; Stephen Paul Illenberger; David Lyle Boese, aka James Michael Shannon; Thomas Tuttle, aka John Patrick Lyons, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-10011. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1989. Decided Sept. 7, 1989. As Amended Oct. 16, 1989. Brian L. Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Reno, Nev., for plaintiff-appellant. David Z. Chesnoff and Kenneth G. Freitas, Goodman, Stein & Chesnoff, Las Vegas, Nev., for defendants-appellees. Richard Mazer, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Tuttle. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before HUG, HALL and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 The Government brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3731 in order to challenge the district court's suppression of evidence in the trial of Robert Richardson Kimball on money laundering charges. The district court ordered the evidence suppressed after concluding that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.