United States v. Daniel McCoy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 202120-10204California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 12 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10204

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00337-JD-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL LAWRENCE MCCOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10205

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-00067-JD-

v.

DANIEL LAWRENCE MCCOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2021 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Daniel McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

suppress and the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release that

requires he submit his electronic devices to search.

We review de novo the district court’s denial of a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.