Norma Candelero Perez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 202119-70900California1,876 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

NORMA CANDELERO PEREZ, No. 19-70900 Petitioner, Agency No. A094-968-336

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 3, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: HIGGINSON,*** HURWITZ, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Norma Isabel Candelero Perez petitions for review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing her appeal from an order of an

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her request for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“Torture Convention”) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Stephen A. Higginson, United States Circuit Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.