Edwin Gomez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 202120-72213California358 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 12 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWIN GOMEZ; EDWIN GOMEZ- No. 20-72213
VELIZ,
Agency Nos. A215-893-800 Petitioners, A215-893-802
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 7, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Edwin Abel Gomez-Veliz and his son, Edwin Benedicto Gomez,
(collectively “Gomez”) petition the summary dismissal of their untimely appeal of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a final removal order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). We have
jurisdiction to review the dismissal under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we review for an
abuse of discretion. Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d…