Edwin Gomez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 202120-72213California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 12 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN GOMEZ; EDWIN GOMEZ- No. 20-72213

VELIZ,

Agency Nos. A215-893-800 Petitioners, A215-893-802

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Edwin Abel Gomez-Veliz and his son, Edwin Benedicto Gomez,

(collectively “Gomez”) petition the summary dismissal of their untimely appeal of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a final removal order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). We have

jurisdiction to review the dismissal under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we review for an

abuse of discretion. Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.