United States v. Anthony Taylor
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 13 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10342
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-50072-DJH-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANTHONY E. TAYLOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 8, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and MCSHANE,*** District Judge.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Anthony Taylor raises two challenges to the sentence administered after the
district court revoked his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We affirm.