United States v. Anthony Taylor

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 202120-10342California427 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10342

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-50072-DJH-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANTHONY E. TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 8, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and MCSHANE,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Anthony Taylor raises two challenges to the sentence administered after the

district court revoked his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We affirm.

Taylor’s first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.