Rajveer Mutti v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 202120-70798California727 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJVEER MUTTI, AKA Rajpal Singh, No. 20-70798

Petitioner, Agency No. A097-744-673

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Rajveer Mutti (also known as Rajpal Singh), a citizen of India, seeks review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his untimely and

numerically barred motion to reopen his immigration proceedings, in which Mutti

sought asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (CAT). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion

and may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.