Dtna

Mustafa Ozgur v. Dtna

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 202120-35920California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUSTAFA OZGUR, No. 20-35920

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00432-JR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA

LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 7, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mustafa Ozgur appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment

for Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (“DTNA”) on Ozgur’s age discrimination

claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). He also raises

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). several discovery-related issues. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

1. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.