Michael Sequeira Osorto v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 202120-72162California443 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OCT 13 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
MICHAEL U. SEQUEIRA OSORTO, No. 20-72162
Petitioner, Agency No. A209-240-020
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 7, 2021** Portland, Oregon
Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Michael Sequeira Osorto seeks review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deny his motion to reopen and rescind his order of removal entered in absentia.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
Because Sequeira conceded that he received actual notice of the hearing in
which he was ordered removed in absentia, and because the notice met the
applicable…