Elvis Ndum v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 202120-73481California826 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 13 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELVIS ACHU NDUM, No. 20-73481

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-187-604

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Elvis Achu Ndum seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

and deny the petition for review.

“We review the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims

for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.