Clohecy

Clohecy v. Robertson CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2021E073927California2,908 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/13/21 Clohecy v. Robertson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARTHA CLOHECY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E073927

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC466497)

MARLENE Z. ROBERTSON, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Chad W. Firetag, Judge.

Affirmed.

The Freeman Law Group, Jordan M. Freeman, and Vance M. Rasmussen for

Defendant and Appellant.

The Law Office of Richard L. Boyer and Richard L. Boyer for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

In 2009, Martha Clohecy obtained a default judgment against Marlene Z.

Robertson. Martha was incompetent; her adult daughter Darcy Clohecy had been

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.