Clohecy
Clohecy v. Robertson CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2021E073927California2,908 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/13/21 Clohecy v. Robertson CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
MARTHA CLOHECY,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E073927
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC466497)
MARLENE Z. ROBERTSON, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Chad W. Firetag, Judge.
Affirmed.
The Freeman Law Group, Jordan M. Freeman, and Vance M. Rasmussen for
Defendant and Appellant.
The Law Office of Richard L. Boyer and Richard L. Boyer for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
In 2009, Martha Clohecy obtained a default judgment against Marlene Z.