Zoom Video Communications, Inc v. Ringcentral, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, No. 21-15792

INC.,

D.C. No. 5:21-cv-01727-EJD Plaintiff-counter- defendant-Appellee,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

RINGCENTRAL, INC.,

Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

RingCentral, Inc. (RingCentral) appeals the district court’s denial of a

preliminary injunction against Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Zoom) arising

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. out of an agreement between the companies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We review the denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion.

All. for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2011). A

district court abuses its…