Zenaida Chule-Lopez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202120-70987California2,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ZENAIDA ESPERANZA CHULE-LOPEZ; No. 20-70987

MARTA ALICIA CHULE-LOPZ, AKA

Marta Alicia Chule-Lopez, Agency Nos. A208-589-358

A208-589-359

Petitioners,

v. ORDER

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: W. FLETCHER, WATFORD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Judge W. Fletcher and Judge Watford vote to grant the petition for panel

rehearing; Judge Collins votes to deny the petition. The petition for panel

rehearing, filed July 30, 2021, is GRANTED. Because we grant the petition for

panel rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The memorandum

disposition filed June 16, 2021, is amended, and the amended version has been

filed concurrently with this order. Further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en

banc may be filed.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.