Joseph Padgett v. A. Curtis Wright
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202119-16383California467 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 14 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH PADGETT, No. 19-16383
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BRIAN LOVENTHAL,
Defendant,
and
A. CURTIS WRIGHT,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 23, 2021 Pasadena, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,** District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Padgett appeals the district court’s order awarding him
attorney’s fees in this long running dispute over enforcement of a fence height
ordinance. See Padgett v. Loventhal, 706 F.3d 1205, 1206, 1208 (9th Cir. 2013)
(remanding for an explanation of attorney’s fee award). In the next appeal, we
vacated the district court’s dismissal of Padgett’s claims for the pretrial services
fees incurred by the…