David Hakim v. Murano, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202118-55674California448 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID HAKIM; et al., No. 18-55674

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-05633-JVS-PLA v.

MURANO, INC., AKA Urban Mall, a MEMORANDUM* California corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,** District Judge.

Plaintiffs David Hakim; San Julian Discount Mart, Inc.; and Mybecca, Inc.;

timely appeal the dismissal of their trademark action. Reviewing for abuse of

discretion, Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. The district court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.