Bryant Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202120-56161California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRYANT FONSECA, an individual, on No. 20-56161 behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01748-GPC-MSB Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,** District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Bryant Fonseca brought claims under the Sherman Act,

California’s Cartwright Act, and California Business and Professions Code § 16600,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. against his former…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.