David Allen etc. v. Gentry CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2021A160180California1,317 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

Filed 10/15/21 David Allen etc. v. Gentry CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DAVID ALLEN, A PROFESSIONAL

LAW CORPORATION, d.b.a.

DAVID ALLEN & ASSOCIATES, A160180

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Solano County Super. Ct. v. No. FCS050830) KELSA GENTRY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff and appellant David Allen (“appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants and respondents Kelsa Gentry (“Gentry”) and the Veen Firm (“Veen”). We affirm. Gentry was seriously injured in a November 2013 car accident that left her confined to a wheelchair. It is undisputed that the driver who caused the accident was an attorney employed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.