Uriel Sanchez-Torres v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-73174California676 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 15 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

URIEL HUGO SANCHEZ-TORRES, No. 20-73174

Petitioner, Agency No. A207-592-058

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Uriel Sanchez-Torres seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an immigration Judge (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Where, as here, the BIA adopts and affirms the decision of the IJ without

noting disagreement, we review the decision of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.