Lacoe

Tina Bradford v. Lacoe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-56148California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TINA MARIE BRADFORD, No. 20-56148

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-03691-PSG-AS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF

EDUCATION; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Tina Marie Bradford appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

her action alleging claims arising from an infection suffered while she was

employed as a substitute teacher. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Bradford’s request for oral argument, set forth in her opening and reply briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.