Ronald Livingston v. Louis Dejoy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202121-55114California406 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RONALD LIVINGSTON, No. 21-55114
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06975-MWF-JPR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LOUIS DeJOY, Postmaster General; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Ronald Livingston appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action arising out of an Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo a sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Scholastic Ent.,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Inc. v. Fox Ent. Grp.,…