Ronald Livingston v. Louis Dejoy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202121-55114California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD LIVINGSTON, No. 21-55114

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06975-MWF-JPR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOUIS DeJOY, Postmaster General; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Ronald Livingston appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action arising out of an Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Scholastic Ent.,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Inc. v. Fox Ent. Grp.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.