Ren Fu Wu v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-71949California849 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 15 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REN FU WU, No. 20-71949

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-143-252

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 13, 2021** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, MILLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Ren Fu Wu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of his application for

asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(1), and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision The agency’s denial of relief rested on its adverse credibility finding.

Substantial evidence supports that finding. See Garland v. Ming Dai, 141 S. Ct.

1669, 1677 (2021); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B).

First,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.