Mary Rogers v. Irs
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
OCT 15 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARY A. NELSON ROGERS, No. 20-17294
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01564-TLN-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE; CHARLES P. RETTING, IRS
Commissioner,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
PAUL J. ENJALRAN, IRS Officer, Area #6; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mary A. Nelson Rogers appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in
her action challenging Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) tax collection efforts. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s
dismissal…