Jerry Kansou v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202119-71907California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY KANSOU, No. 19-71907

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-927-125

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 13, 2021** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, MILLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jerry Kansou asks this Court to grant his petition for review and to

reverse his order of removal. As the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them

only as necessary to explain our decision. We do not have jurisdiction to review

this petition, and we therefore deny it.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). This Court only has jurisdiction to review a petition to the extent the claims

presented were exhausted in front…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.