Helian Chen v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-72645California507 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HELIAN CHEN, No. 20-72645
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-733-488
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 13, 2021** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, MILLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Helian Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions this court for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) denial of his claim for asylum. As
the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our
decision.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). I
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination.
Cf., e.g., Garcia v. Holder, 749 F.3d 785, 789 (9th Cir. 2014).