Gabriel Eckard v. Daniel Sites

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-35268California329 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL ECKARD, No. 20-35268

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00738-RSM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL STITES, Deputy, Snohomish County Jail,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Gabriel Eckard appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a due process

violation arising from his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling on cross-motions for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). summary judgment.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.