Cirila Verastegui-Araujo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202120-72455California551 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CIRILA VERASTEGUI-ARAUJO, AKA No. 20-72455 Asminda Valle, AKA Cirila Verastegui, AKA Asminda Verastegui-Valle, Agency No. A088-639-160

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Cirila Verastegui-Araujo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen and reconsider removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen

or a motion to reconsider.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.