Myers

Myers v. Dorsaneo CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2021A161586California2,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 10/18/21 Myers v. Dorsaneo CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CAROL MYERS,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161586

v. ALEXANDRIA DORSANEO, (Marin County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant.

CIV2001048)

Appellant Alexandria Dorsaneo appeals from an order denying statutory attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. Dorsaneo claims she is entitled to fees because Myers, who obtained a temporary civil restraining order against her, voluntarily dismissed the case at the outset of the hearing on a full restraining order. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying fees and affirm.

BACKGROUND1

In her civil harassment petition and papers in opposition to Dorsaneo’s fee motion, Myers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.